Background

Our company faced the challenge of integrating AI into both client projects and internal processes. While AI promised increased speed by automating routine tasks, the actual barrier to adoption wasn’t a lack of technical capability, but psychological resistance within our teams.

What We Tried (and Why)

The initial objective was to leverage AI to improve internal efficiency, encouraging designers, developers, and BAs to use AI tools for drafting, code assistance, and documentation respectively. However, despite successfully integrating the tools, adoption was inconsistent due to underlying fears and a lack of trust in AI.

What Broke or Didn’t Work

The perceived existential threats of AI—such as job replacement and fear of making mistakes—prevented meaningful engagement. Additionally, the overwhelming feeling of an already steep learning curve deterred use. Most crucially, understanding that AI adoption is more about cultural acceptance than technical efficiency was a major learning point.

📌 Key takeaway: AI adoption requires addressing psychological and cultural shifts rather than just technical integration.

The Shift We Made

Our approach transitioned from tool-focused training to fostering trust. This involved open dialogues, leaders demonstrating AI usage, encouraging openness about mistakes, and promoting small, manageable AI implementations. Crucially, participation was voluntary, fostering curiosity and experimentation without pressure.

What Worked (and What Still Doesn’t)

These changes helped build a culture where using AI tools became more normalized and curiosity-driven. Although momentum is building, there remains a lack of uniform structure, with some teams preferring more guidance and formalized processes. The balance between allowing organic growth and ensuring consistent operational maturity continues to need refinement.

Tradeoffs and Strategic Decisions

Flexible Exploration Structured Implementation
Encourages creativity and organic adoption Ensures consistent and predictable usage
May lead to uneven application across teams Might stifle innovation and flexible approaches

Open Questions We’re Still Exploring

  • How do we maintain a balance between structured AI implementation and flexible user-led exploration?
  • What mechanisms should be in place to support emotional aspects of AI adoption in teams?
  • How can we best foster a sense of ownership and empowerment in AI usage amongst team members?

If You’re Solving Something Similar…

We invite engineers and researchers to share their experiences and insights into creating a psychologically safe environment for AI adoption. How do you foster team empowerment while integrating AI into your workflows?

We believe we can reframe software delivery from the ground up, where every decision, tool, and interaction is guided by contextual intelligence.

Contact: hello@cadabra.studio
More at: https://cadabra.studio

🔗 Explore More Perspectives